Election Fraud Court Rulings

False claims have been made by members of the media that there has been no evidence and no court rulings of election fraud in the 2020 election. Here is the truth.

This is a case from the 2020 election in which a Mississippi Judge ruled that the election was so fraudulent that a new election was ordered. Here’s an article about that case: Mississippi Judge Rules 78 Percent of Mail-In Ballots Fraudulent, Orders New Election.

In Pennsylvania, a court also ruled that the Secretary of State illegally accepted late ballots. The article says:

“Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that mail-in ballots could be accepted three days after Election Day, Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar submitted guidance that said proof of identification could be provided up until Nov. 12, which is six days from the ballot acceptance deadline.”

Pennsylvania court: Secretary of state lacked authority to change deadline 2 days before Election Day

One of the biggest problems with obtaining rulings on fraud evidence in the 2020 election is that many courts refused to hear the cases based on evidence. Many cases are still in process and I intend to update this post as more rulings are made.